Next week’s EU summit should be a chance for the bloc’s leaders to set out an ambitious strategic agenda. At stake is the future of the eurozone, the shape of Europe’s defence and security ambitions and a decades-long failure to agree a refugee and asylum policy.
US president Donald Trump has punctured the continent’s comfort zone with his steel tariffs and broader rejection of global institutions such as the G7. It is now up to the German chancellor Angela Merkel and French president Emmanuel Macron to step into the breach. But don’t bet on it. The summit could go terribly wrong.
It is clear that Paris and Berlin have diametrically opposed views about what the future of the EU should look like. France wants a Europe that acts strategically across the board. Germany has shunned a broad strategy in favour of cautious incrementalism. It is hard to see how both views can be reconciled.
Mr Macron has set out bold plans for an integrated EU. His proposals would lead to a two-speed Europe, with the European Commission having substantial influence on fiscal policy and the eurozone countries calling the shots through an EU finance minister, a banking union and a eurozone budget.
Ms Merkel responded this month, belatedly and cautiously. The chancellor, who is now in her fourth and probably final term, faces big problems at home as well as serious divisions among the EU member states.
The risk-averse Ms Merkel politically and instinctively supports an intergovernmental approach in which the member states, not the commission, would wield influence. She is loath to have a common EU budget or fund that would, as she sees it, weaken the motivation for Italy to undertake major structural reforms. Besides, her conservative bloc would not buy into an agreement that would require Germany to spend more to bail out badly run economies, in addition to ceding parliamentary oversight to Brussels. For Ms Merkel, such a concession would be political suicide.
Her other worry is that Mr Macron’s policies would lead to a differentiated Europe that would marginalise non-eurozone members. That scenario would play into the hands of populist-led governments in Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic, who enjoy railing against Brussels.
Further south, with support from central European leaders, populist parties in Austria and Italy are focused on controlling the flows of refugees and migrants first and foremost. EU reforms take second place.
Since the EU is not likely to make meaningful progress over defence and security issues, Mr Macron has proposed a French-led European Intervention Force. It is a kind of coalition of the willing, neither hobbled by EU institutions nor member states. That speaks volumes about Paris’s low expectations about European defence and security ambitions.
Ms Merkel herself does not ask hard questions about the strategic role of Germany’s miserably equipped armed forces. German soldiers do not even have enough thermal underwear, let alone bulletproof vests or submarines that work.
The chancellor pays lip service to consolidating Europe’s wasteful armaments industry, but she was the one that in 2012 pulled the plug on a €35bn merger between Britain’s BAE Systems and EADS (now Airbus), which is partly owned by Germany. National sovereignty, jobs and a pacifist culture have prevailed over efficiency and strategic thinking here.
Then there is Brexit. The UK’s vote to leave has changed the dynamics inside the EU. The balance of power has shifted to France and Germany, but it’s not quite that clear-cut. The Dutch and Swedes, Danes and Finns, Irish and Baltic states hate the idea of losing a Britain that supported a pro-free market but fiscally strict EU. London also checked the pace of the Franco-German engine.
Now, these countries want Ms Merkel to push back against Mr Macron’s policies because they are intrinsically federalist and feel, to some, French-dominated. At the same time, their leaders want to know what plans Ms Merkel herself has for the bloc.
Maybe they will be enlightened on Tuesday, when Mr Macron and Ms Merkel meet outside Berlin to forge a common position ahead of the EU summit. One thing is clear: muddling through is no longer a viable option.