In this year’s Budget, the UK Chancellor Phillip Hammond introduced sweeping regulatory reforms that could mean that driverless cars will be able to be tested on Britain’s roads by 2021, without any human operator inside or outside the car and without legal constraints.
Some of these changes could be positive for society. For instance, driverless cars are likely to be much better drivers than humans, because they will not speed, get distracted or tired or drive while impaired. The scope for reductions in road injuries and fatalities is substantial, considering that around 90 per cent of accidents are caused by human error, although the number of car accidents are declining in most countries because of improvements in car technology, roads, driving and emergency health care.
But there are also potential pitfalls.
While driverless cars have the potential to create significant value for society, the benefits are unlikely to be evenly distributed and may even contribute to widening income and opportunity inequalities. Advancing technology could create disproportionate opportunities for some highly skilled workers and owners of capital, while replacing the labour of less skilled workers – such as taxi drivers and lorry drivers – with machines.
Some also worry about the impact on public transport services. On one hand, driverless cars could provide more convenient access to public transport services encouraging their use. But on the other hand, they could also encourage people to switch from travelling on more sustainable modes of travel, like bus and rail – or from walking or cycling.
Additionally, if driverless cars increase the convenience of travel, people will want to travel more. Many cities and countries are already struggling with traffic congestion and adding in more travel will only make the situation worse. Notwithstanding the additional empty cars that could be added to road traffic.
In the longer term, the transport system also could affect urban, regional and even national structures, influencing where people live and work, housing prices, the distances travelled to work, as well as people’s health and happiness. Sustainable and liveable areas do not happen without planning and regulation. Policymakers could look to those cities that wholeheartedly embraced the new innovation of about 100 years ago – the motor car – to take away key lessons on the potential influence of transport innovation on the places where people live.
So, while vehicle technology moves ahead, policymakers need to get into the race to catch up by considering these four actions: ensure workers who are likely to lose their jobs as a result of the new technology get the new skills they need to allow them to contribute productively to work, make sure that the benefits of this new technology do not contribute further to inequality across society, plan for potential increases in demand for road travel, and plan more generally to ensure that this new technology contributes to more sustainable and liveable urban areas.
Rather than waiting to see how new technologies will influence society, governments could act now to help shape the adoption of these technologies to ensure that they provide maximum benefit to society.